The Problem with Rocklahoma...
More on Rocklahoma today. The festival this year was basically a let down – I was very vocal from the start about the weak lineup. I knew attendance would be light – still it was weird actually experiencing a half empty rock fest.
Did I have fun? Yes.
Did I enjoy seeing my friends? You betcha.
Do I feel like an abused consumer? Yes.
I spent $450 on my VIP ticket (including fees). This isn’t counting money on airfare, a car, a hotel and extras. Rocklahoma started giving away buy one, get one reserved seats a few weeks ago – then promoters allowed upgrades at the gate. These upgrades were cheaper than my ticket – and often the people got better seats!
Last night on Eddie Trunk Live, Eddie Trunk broke down all of Rocklahoma’s problems. He didn’t say anything I haven’t said over the past 10 months – but now maybe someone in control will listen.
The attendance issue, according to Eddie, is because of billing. No kidding. Eddie and I both agree Stryper does not a Saturday headliner make. In the same vein, Anthrax isn’t a headliner either.
Eddie kept using the number 5,000 to describe attendance. I would imagine he has access to the true attendance figures, so if 5,000 is the official tally, that’s really sad.
Like me – and ANYONE that attended Rocklahoma over the weekend – Eddie thinks the fest needs moved from July. It’s simply too damn hot. It’s miserable, the bands get sick and no one wants to sit on a hard bench when it is 115 degrees at 2 in the afternoon. I don’t know if moving the festival to May or September would work, but at this point, I’d say it’s worth a shot.
Midway through the weekend, Eddie announced a VIP renewal special for $250. This is obviously a major discount. There are conflicting reports that the event will be four days next year – some people say they heard three. The people working in the VIP tent said people could only get the $250 rate on-site, but the Rocklahoma Twitter is advertising the special now – so what is the motivation in giving the festival money so far in advance? There is none.
I’m pleased Eddie was so brutally honest on his show. He talked about agents taking advantage of the Rocklahoma promoters, overcharging and grandstanding about the quality of bands. Someone apparently gave the person with the pocket book some bad information. Eddie implied he offered advice on the lineup for this year, but no one seemed to pay attention. Maybe someone with the checkbook will listen to Eddie for 2010. At least he understands the difference between a headline act and a main stage opener.
Finally – there was no official program book this year. Instead, volunteers were passing out a newspaper type program. The thing was filled with errors, including saying Jani Lane is the current lead singer of Warrant and this Rocklahoma performance would be their first time together in a long time. Problem is, Robert Mason is the lead singer of Warrant – and Warrant with Jani Lane played Rocklahoma last year! There were plenty of snide comments mocking the Glam bands, calling Helix old, using a picture of RATT with Robbin Crosby and mentioning the addition of John Corabi “...from Motley Crue.”
As a Glam supporter, I don't want Rocklahoma to die. I also don't want to be ripped off and watch a bunch of bar bands play for 200 people when they were promised 10,000. I can't imagine what it feels like to be on stage and look into an empty crowd. I assume it's one of the worst feelings in the world.
I promised more photos and they are coming - life is chaos - but thank you for reading as always. Hopefully I'll have the snaps up ASAP!
Reader Comments (29)
who cares if a band is "headliner material"?
if you go there planning to have a bad time, guess what you have?
this page is ridiculous. i am tired of listening to everyone's dramatic opinions about how everything is horrible.
i saw bands i thought i would never see, and they played great. sorry you don't appreciate all but 3 bands the whole weekend. wahh motley and poison didn't play. dig deeper into this genre before you open your mouth.
you knew the lineup, you saw the weather forecast, you have been there before. you had a chance to pull out. so suck it up and appreciate what happened the past 4 days. and don't go next year.
I agree that the same bands is not the answer. More and more obscure bands to make sure they are not the same, is also not the answer. Some repeats are inevitable. So long as the headliner changes and gets better each year, the rest of the lineup would not greatly affect sales IMO and would leave room for you to bring in your pet bands like Bonfire.
I for one thought the price was too high for the bands that were playing.
Ryo
http://rockandrollguru.blogspot.com
Anyway, this year the party was not that great either. The crowds were slim, it was incredibly hot and I was not easily entertained. I am thinking they need to come up with something else rather than "It's all about the party!" because it isnt. The first time I heard the number 5000 attendance was as a pre-ROK prediction and I thought surely that would be way off. Now that it's over and I was there I seriously think that number would be a reach for any given day. And get this-anytime the promoters/management inflate the numbers it just looks bad on their part because we know they have no qualms about telling flat-out lies.
The line up at M3 was a perfect example of how a festival works for everone, all the way from the techs to the paying costomers.
We have done three festivals so far this year and I was hopping that Rocklahoma was going to knock my socks off, NOT, so far M3 has been the best by far, RGW is in Aug, we will have to wait and see....
These are my opions and in any way reflect any disrespect to others.
I will say I did see some acts on the side stages (tents) that should have been on the main stage.There were some really good tallent out there, sorry I couldnt produce any names for you all, I guess that part of my brain got boiled.
NOTE to the promoters....listen to the paying costomers and not the greedy agents, take chances, get a headliner that is a headliner and will act and produce as a headliner should.......J!!!!!
It may be time for Rocklahoma to lose the hair metal format....maybe not completely, but have one big day for the hair metal acts, one day for heavy metal, and through a current rock day in there as well.
Look at what the Download festival is doing as an example. I bet their attendance was 10 x Rocklahoma's and it was a three day festival.
I really liked the way M3 was put together except for the overlapping schedules (which is pretty much unavoidable).
I wonder how many tickets Rocklahoma would have sold if everyone knew the headliners were Anthrax, Ratt & Stryper. I like all of these bands, but all 3 are club acts at best these days. You need an arena act for a headliner, and ROK didn't have one (except Twisted Sister).
If this festival could have brought in say, Judas Priest, Whitesnake & Heaven & Hell, their attendance numbers would have been a lot greater. Megadeth would have been the perfect headliner for heavy metal day. Not sure what the payout is for those bands, but I would guess it would have doubled, maybe even tripled there attendance for each day.