Friday
Feb212014
Back In Time With Def Leppard
Friday, February 21, 2014 at 12:01AM
No, it's not 1996 again, but Def Leppard has just re-released Slang. The deluxe reissue came out not too long ago and it includes lots of previously unreleased songs. To promote the release, Def Leppard just created a lyric video for the song "Where Does Love Go When It Dies."
I know this reissue is a head scratcher to some, but Slang has always been one of my favorite Def Lep albums. I ordered my copy.
Reader Comments (9)
I'll take a dose of crap (or silence) for this, but _Slang_ reminds me of Megadeth's _Risk_. I heard the first singles off both of those 90s albums without knowing who it was that was performing (not an easy trick when radio stations still held sway). And, in both cases, I liked the songs. I also like both of those albums and saw both bands supporting them on tour. I think they both differ from what was expected (_Risk_ perhaps more than _Slang_) at the time, from the bands, given their recent catalogs.
Megadeth was coming off "bridge" albums in _Cryptic Writings_ and _Youthanasia_ that didn't even begin to suggest the musical turn that _Risk_ became . . . and was then promptly abandoned. It was so much more "radio-friendly" than either of the previous albums.
With _Slang_ it was a bit different. The sound of the band had become far too syrupy as Clark's influence waned and his health deteriorated. _Adrenalize_ and the singles they released, around the time of _Retro Active_ and the greatest hits package, suggest a band at odds with itself: ballads for the ladies or high-gloss shells of their former _Hysteria_ greatness (sidebar: I prefer them from _Pyromania_ backwards to their debut). _Slang_ strikes me as an attempt to update their sound (catching some current trends) while also stripping things back to a more basic sound from the pre-1984 days. Sure, it is hit and miss. But so is _Risk_.
I think the legend grew that these were both more miss than they actually were. And I think hearing them out of context (the singles that is) helped prime me to listen to the albums in a different way.
[Not that anyone cares, but I also think both albums are heavily influenced by the input of the guitarists: the loss of Clark--that band's Cliff Burton--and emergence of Collen and addition of Campbell on the one hand; the input of Friedman--a creative and talented player who had finally gotten to the point that he could bend Mustaine's ear and tweak at his ego--on the other. Both bands diverge in how those influences played out. But I still wager that they helped shape the perception of the album by influencing the direction of the same.]
Just my two cents.
It was right after this CD that I lost interest in their new material. Coincidence maybe? Maybe not.
p.s. Great writing, as usual, HIM.
In the case of DL, I find myself missing that "little something extra" that Clark added to the band, visually and musically.