No Booklet - No Waste?
Earlier this week I reviewed the new Sammy Hagar disc. I mentioned that CD was packaged in an environmentally friendly way: with no book. The more I think about it, I can't help but wonder how much we're missing without those precious liner booklets.
Seriously, I've never thrown a single CD away in my life. That means no jewel cases in the landfill - and no booklets there, either. I don't know too many music lovers that just pitch CDs, cases and booklets. I think distributing albums in digipacks made of recycled materials is great. I think skipping the booklet and sending fans to a website for liner information is bad.
I've written about my love of liner notes in the past. I am absolutely bummed when I buy a new CD only to find there's no book - or just a folded insert. I like booklets that include lyrics and production credits. This might be selfish, if so, I apologize.
I'm trying to reduce my carbon footprint. I recycle at home and at work. I only wash clothes in cold water. I'm a strict vegetarian. I avoid taking plastic bags at stores when not necessary. I drive a tiny car and I don't go many places that are unplanned. I think this allows me my liner booklet.
Seriously, if we all did a little more to save the earth - like some of the stuff I just listed above - we could keep liner notes. These notes are the personal link for fans to a band. How else are we supposed to learn a band's most ardent supporters? Their family members? Their endorsement deals?
Now, if you simply buy a CD and chuck the case in the rubbish can, shame on you. That's irresponsible to the earth and disrespectful to the music. Still, I highly doubt many of you out there make this a common practice.
When a CD case says "Visit [INSERT NAME] website here for album credits" it's more a marketing ploy than fan appreciation. Sure, some fans (like me) might log on to see who produced and engineered - but a lot of people will get side tracked with artist news, forums...and crap for sale. I think the web should be used in tandem with more traditional marketing - and that includes a paper CD booklet.
Thoughts?
Reader Comments (18)
Anyway, I'm still with you...I like liner notes no matter what. One of my favorite artists, Dave Barnes, had fantastic liner notes-with jokes and things-in his first albums, and then took them away in the last one.I have to say, I was really disappointed. Reading liners is just one of those ways I bond with an artist, y'know? If I'm going to pay $15 for a CD, I want something tangible to enjoy along with it..whether it be lyrics or what. Liner notes are just part of the experience of buying the album.
We have dozens of other ways to stay green, so don't take this away from me. I don't want hard-copy albums to be a subject I bewilder my children with.
I'd be more happy, if the artist passed on some of the packaging savings to us, the consumer. I realize it's not the artist making the decisions on price point, but, for me, when I was able to start buying blank CD's for $.25 or less, it's made it real hard to justify paying $13 -$15 for one at the store with some tunes on it.
Listening to as much music as I do, paying $9.99 for an iTunes album instead of $13.99 at Best Buy, makes a difference over the long haul, when you calculate the $4.00 per album that you're saving.
So, in a nutshell, not having an album cover, liner notes, or lyrics doesn't have that much of an impact on me.
And I don't think this is wasteful at all, because I cherish those physical artifacts. I still have cds I bought in my early teens. I've gone through a few generic cases - which I realise is bad cause they're the most wasteful part of most packaging - but if I stop being offered the opportunity to buy so much music with thoughtfully-compiled packaging, I can guarantee I'll find myself buying less music.
Also I'm usually interested in the lyrics - while listening to the music. What am I supposed to do - print out the lyrics from the net? I doubt that helps the cause in any way.
now everything is changing in a different way. most of these artists or labels that are not doing booklets, well it's not because it's better for the environment. it's just cheaper on their end not to do it. less cost means more profit. and if they can get you to go to their website there is that chance for you to get sidetracked and perhaps you will buy something else. i feel that's why most of them do it. not out of some dedication to improving the world. more out of somededication to improve their profit intake.
When we were dealing with the packaging for "All Comes Down To You", (shameless plug, so kill me), there was almost no discussion about what to include in the CD. Live shots? check. Lyrics? Not that they're earthshattering but check. Special Thanks listing people that only a handful of people know? Check. Is it still cool? Bet you ass it is - I'm old school. If I were buying "All Comes Down To You", (Tonight You Rock, available exclusively on Retrospect Records.. hint, hint), I'd want something just as visually tangible as the music is, sonically.
And besides, if you're gonna spend $11.99, (What? Only $11.99?!?), then that's money that could have been spent elsewhere... If a band wants my money, give me something worth every penny.
(Like Tonight You Rock's CD "All Comes Down To You".)
Ok, ok... stop throwing things at me....!
If i bought that Hagar disc (not a fan, so I won't anyway) I'd be pretty annoyed, might as well have saved some $$ and downloaded it.
So I 100% agree with you.