Ladies, you'll probably remember your mothers saying "you can't change a man." Talk about the truth. It's hard to change a person. We are individual creatures of our own design with a specific world view, unique to only ourselves. Still, groups of people - such as sports teams or musicians - often share the same attitudes and behaviors. We've seen this with many a rock band...one member becomes a drug addict... and then suddenly everyone is off the wagon. Then, one person gets clean...and everyone is in rehab. While changing a person isn't good, altering a behavior or habit is something totally different. I believe you can always improve yourself...and that surely applies to the musicians we love.
A lot of Glam musicians have some
very bad habits. I don't care about the personal habits -- I do, however, care about the ones that interfere with music making. Today we'll talk about my cherished Aerosmith. Yes Aerosmith were drug addicts but they got clean and good for them. That is none of my business. My complaint? I wish Aerosmith would stop using outside writers every time the band needs a new tune.
A lot of bands use outside writers these days - and it doesn't really seem to matter the level of fame, although older bands seem to use more help. Some of this could be complacency, or apathy, or lack of creativity. I've often wondered if bands - the rare ones that enjoy prolific careers like Aerosmith - are actually plagued by their success. Think about it: a band is young and hungry - both literally and creatively. It's either write a good song and get a record deal...or starve. Play or die basically. Very few will make it - and even less will make it big. So, these are rare bands. The chosen few humans pulled together by rare instances to create harmony out of a very dissonant world. When you are young and hungry, you do what you gotta do. You scratch your way out of a bad situation. Desperate times often mean for great writing. When you're middle aged and filthy rich...there isn't much scratching left. Perhaps this is why bands like Aerosmith use the outside writers.
Here's the irony: those outside writers are often very famous and also exceptionally wealthy. They don't know how to scratch either! Also, how can they tell a band's unique story...when not an official member?! Without the history and chemistry, the end result if often obviously forced. Very rarely does this equal a good album.
Perhaps I'm prejudiced: I have no issue with pop artists using songs written by others. That form of music seems destined for writing help. When it comes to rock, Glam or Metal...I think it must be band members or bust. Agree?
Reader Comments (15)
i notice you now have moderator enable posting - i gather the idiots have been out in force - shame that.
and Aerosmith still writes some of the music.
and Aerosmith still writes some of the song.
Yes, I'm moderating comments - for now. You guessed the reason. Thanks for understanding. Hopefully this temporary lapse of *sanity* will curb things and we can get back to our regularly scheduled Glam programming.
-- Allyson
1. The bands you mention have done the scratching, and have made it.
2. Why bring drugs into this topic, it has nothing to do with outside song writers.
3.They are middle age and i hope by the time you and I are middle age we will be able to stop scratching too.
4. Most of the great songs in this world have been covered, modified to become even greater songs or not.
I can see your point of veiw and i hope that you can see mine.
Holly Night, Marti Frederiksen, Glen Ballard, Desmond Child, Diane Warren, Jim Vallance.....even Jack Blades & Tommy Shaw! Makes you wonder if the creativity dried up when they did!
Steve
Heavy Metal Addiction
http://hardrockheavymetal.wordpress.com/
Hard Rock / Metal bands write riffs, not songs. Only a small percentage of people can write "songs" and understand the theory behind the process. Any kid with a guitar can write metal "riffs".
But then what about people like Carole King or Bernie Taupin distributing their work to recording artists? I have no problem with the people who record that material. And what about the time when, as someone else noted above, multiple covers of the same song were popular simultaneously? It wasn't seen as disingenuous.
What's the difference between the two scenarios, though; the frauds and those who can get away with it? One could say that the former applies to "bands" and the latter to "pop stars," but I don't think a delineation needs to be set between the two; a musician is a musician is a musician, and if they're going to be in the industry, they should be held to the same standards (I'll keep wishing it, anyway). Perhaps it's more a matter of "then" vs "now," wherein we have more stringent expectations for performers at this point; you're no longer seen as a legitimate artist if you're not penning the entirety of your ouvre. Or maybe it's just that, using your example of Aerosmith, the bands who make their name playing their own music are expected to continue the practice or risk being labeled as sellouts.
Then again, Aerosmith did "Train Kept a-Rollin'" out the outset of their career, so they weren't entirely free of outside material even then.
Maybe I have no answer. Interesting subject matter to chew on, though.
The problem with bands like Aerosmith is not that they use outside writers, but that they use outside writers who are little more than hired guns and have no interest in what kind of music they are writing or who they are writing for.
A writer who writes a song for Aerosmith this week, Britney Spears next week, and Shania Twain the week after isn't the same as someone who truly loves metal working with a band they believe in. The process is different, the motives are different, and the results are definately different.