The Brilliance That Is Axl Rose
My previous post was a review of Steven Adler's book, My Appetite for Destruction, which was not my favorite book. However, one idea that Steven floats in his book is about Axl, and the thought resonated with me.
As we all know, Axl is notorious for starting the show late...really late. It has become his calling card or his identity; that he is completely unpredictable. Steven attempted to shed some light on this issue, and quite honestly, the explanation made sense to me. Essentially, what Steven writes is that Axl performs best in an emotionally charged environment. So basically, Axl will wait - and he will make his fans wait - causing impatience, anxiousness, frustration, and an adverse reaction to the unknown. The crowd begins to get worked up and the tension and emotion in the building rises, and then, just when it is about to peak, you hear the opening bars to "Welcome to the Jungle." Wherever you are, odds are the crowd is going to erupt. His making the crowd wait and wait only served to get people worked up, and ultimately it all adds up to a better, emotionally charged performance.
So, is this brilliance or is this simply being an egotistical, irresponsible performer? Personally, I think it is brilliant and it works for him. Not every band could pull the same stunts and get away with it. If I go see KISS, I know the show will start and end on time, and it will all go according to plan. There are no surprises, but you get what you expect. But, with Axl, you don't know what to expect and it results in an environment that is better suited for a Guns 'n' Roses show.
So your thoughts: is Axl a genius, or am I just buying into the hype?
Reader Comments (31)
True genuises often times have personality quirks, as they operate on a different level than the average member of soceity. Axl is far away superior to his peers. Listen to Chinese Democracy, to the levels of sounds on that album and how they all work together perfectly; and then tell me, could they guys in Trixter write something like that, or Crue, or the Scorpions. The simple fact is Axl thinks in a way that others just are not able to.
And he understands what makes a good show. If he didn't care, then why would he, after making everyone wait for his arrival, then put on a 3 hour show and leave everyone amazed. Why would want to incur the fines for paying late? Those are the costs of putting on the shows that is able to deliver.
The one time I have been able to see GnR, they came on very late, but every was so anxious for the show, that by the time it started, the place went nuts. It was amazing!
Allyson
One thing will remain...Axl and GnR in their prime could NOT be touched by ANYONE! Welcome to the jungle bitches LOL
Regardless of his reasons for doing so, starting concerts 2 hours late is disrespectful to fans. I've been to a few GNR shows that started on time, and a few others that started late. The opening riff to Welcome in the Jungle gets the same roar. The only difference is that when he starts on time, people stay until the end of the show. When he starts at 11:00 (which has happened to me TWICE), 1/4 of the people are gone by the end of the show.
From about 1989, after reading/seeing a few interviews with the guy, I was pretty much convinced that Axl was an asshole. He says and does stuff to get attention and create shock value. Always has. In that way, he wasn't too far away from 80s-era Madonna or Michael Jackson. It doesn't mean he's not talented, it just means that he's trying to manipulate the media (and you) in order to get as much attention as possible. He seems to like it that way.
Because I took the Axl=asshole position, it meant that I REALLY didn't like him. I wasn't in thrall of him when all GnR's best albums came out. I wasn't going to say that the Use Your Illusions were a work of genius when I found most of the albums' material to be a rambling act of self-importance. For me, they marked a point where Axl was seriously and insidiously starting to control the band as a whole. They weren't as well-balanced as Appetite had been. It began to become The Axl Show.
But after conjugating on it for a couple of years (and after all the riots and the sexual assault stories and the carry-on associated with that), I began to wonder whether we weren't actually seeing the gradual exposure of a man who was seriously mentally ill. Not just eccentric, and not so much INTENTIONALLY doing all of the awful stuff that he did. I dunno: maybe that was my act of forgiving him for being a jerk, and endeavoring to understand the guy. Since then, the more I've watched, the more convinced I've become. I didn't see anything in Steven's book that would refute that for me. I don't think the guy's JUST an egomaniac, I think he's mentally ill.
The saddest thing about it is that I think Axl found a work environment were people will just enable him in his illness. Who tries to help the guy or tell him that he's wrong? So he can go through life threatening and/or acting out serious violence on people, and everyone just goes "Hehehe... Oh Axl, you're such a character!" It's entertaining to watch him freak out. It's really, really funny to read (just yesterday) about him suing over a 3-year-old video game that has a picture of Slash in it. But I'm now less convinced that it's attention-seeking and more convinced that he really doesn't know it's wrong. He lives on Planet Axl.
And I guess a lot of people would say that it's exactly his mental instability that makes him a good artist... which I disagree with whole-heartedly. Like most ill artists who start down this road, he will have a brief moment in the sun where everyone hails him as a genius, before disintegrating spectacularly. As Lou alluded, Jim Morrison is probably a good example of that. Artists can have demons (and egos) without tipping into mental illness. As a friend of mine put it the other day: the difference is often just one less rational thought when it really counts.
So yeah... Honestly, I feel sorry for the guy. And I would never, ever want to work with him.
There's so many stories about people starting to riot during shows because of his asshole behaviour that I think he's far from a genius.
Talented? yes. Genius? No way, sir!
But I guess that's what drew us into GnR back in the day, so ...
http://www.uggtodoor.com
Is Axl incredibly talented? Yes.
Is he immature, temperamental, and occasionally self-destructive? Does he surround himself with sycophants who can/will never tell him when he is being an egotistical jerk? Absolutely.
Put succinctly, I believe that I am a fan who recognizes both personality traits: I admire the talent, and of course 'Appetite' is an absolute classic, but I refuse to put up with the conceited, self-important behavior, so I will never pay $$ to see "Axl & friends" live in concert.
@ Rita, nice usage of the word sycophants. Really applies to the people surrounding Axl.