Archive and Search
Login
« Rock Fest Lineup Includes Mix of Modern Metal and Glam | Main | Def Leppard, Poison and Tesla Tour Confirmed »
Saturday
Jan142017

When Metal Members Go Missing

Today's post is from our friend HIM.
 
As fans of metal, we know it is filled with lots of sleaze, and not just the good kind!
 
Seriously, though, there are instances when bands move on and leave their past behind. So, I ask you: what constitutes a good omission in the life of a legendary band? Framed differently: how much are bands and artists allowed to excise from their past if, in fact, the parts they remove were integral to their legacy? I will start with a softball of a question.
 
Where was Bill Ward? Article:
 
 
This is an easy one in retrospect. Ward requested that Sabbath remove his image because of the morass that their “reunion” had become. While I still side with Ward on the overall situation, I don’t begrudge Sabbath for following a request with legal implications.  So let me step it up a wee bit.
 
Where is Michael Anthony? Article:
 
 
Well, he is there now. But we all know that Van Halen are a secretive, and spiteful, bunch. One brother, or both, seem comfortable with revising the band’s history so as to settle scores old, real, and imagined. Anthony, on the other hand shrugs and smiles. Let me end with a more troubling question.
 
Where is Dave Holland? Image:
 
 
He wasn’t the first drummer in Priest. Nor should he be blamed or praised for the change in direction that was Turbo. But Holland was an integral part of their several-stage transition toward stadium-metal glory. He was their Phil Rudd. There is a problem though. He is also a convicted sex offender. You see the point? I see Priest’s point.
 
But I wonder: was a 30th anniversary release of Turbo made better by offering it alongside a poster that, for fans, actually draws attention to what is missing—also an issue in the previous instances—even as it celebrates what was created? Were there no other promo shots available? Was the revised cover artwork not enough to stand alone, or perhaps a glossy version of the original cover to go with the release?
 
I often wonder about a lot of things. I wonder about the real world struggle and strife, the ugly and horrendous things that go into the songs we love by the bands we idolize. I wonder about all of that still, even after I know a lot more than I want to about those bands and those songs. I also wonder about the choices these bands make, time and again, as artists and as brands, to project their images out to all of their fans. And so I end with a question that is a request. What bands and artists that you love have issues that, try as they might to obscure them, come uncomfortably spilling out?

 

Reader Comments (7)

Pantera!! Dimebag was Diamond Darrell and their first couple albums were glam and they had "some" success. But then again, I could've sold 500K albums in 1983 and I can't play a note.

Dave Holland was convicted. Priest epitomized the Spinal Tap scenes of a new drummer every other day back in the '70's till Holland, then obviously Travis for the last 25+ years. Agree with JP putting only the four of them for the promo art. Not worth hullabaloo for a re-issue that'll probably sell 5K its first week out. But then again; Holland ON the artwork could just be the "any news is good news" PR to push an extra couple units. In the end; The Metal Gods made the right decision.
January 14, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterKixchix
KISS, in some regards, fits into this to me. Paul & Gene go to great lengths to make the casual fan think of the members as the characters rather than the individual members. There are some modern fans that have no idea who the original Spaceman or Cayman are.
January 14, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterJAT
Fascinating topic, HIM...

JAT nails the conundrum completely. Aside from the begrudgeonly nod to Frehley and Criss as they are original members, unless Gene and Paul liked you, there's no mention of you, i.e. The failure to mention Vinnie Vincent at the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Induction for his contributions to the album, "Lick It Up", which saved their a*s!

And KixChix gets it right. Priest made the correct decision when it comes to erasing Holland.
January 14, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterMetalboy!
Def Leppard and Pete Willis anyone?
January 14, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterGary
Not to change the subject, but I got to say, I already had huge respect as a big fan of Cheap Trick, but when they were honored at the RRHF, guess who shows up with open arms? Bun E Carlos, who hasn't played with them in it seems a hundred years, not only that he has a long going lawsuit with the band, but yet they STILL all came together which just made them even more of one of my favorite groups, much respect for them to do that, for each other, for the fans, unlike VH, GnR and a few other groups.
January 16, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterDarktown
Hear, hear, Darktown! My sentiments, EXACTLY!
January 20, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterMetalboy!
I concur with both of you. Acrimony and financial misdealings aside, they--the four of them--created some very special music. They put it to the side for the good of the show (regardless what I think about the show). It was a classy way to act. Other bands could learn something from them.
January 20, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterHim

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.